woman smiling

A Hillary win would be historic, but not a game changer for women, professor says


With Hillary Clinton’s long-awaited announcement of her 2016 presidential campaign now official, the analysts, poll watchers, commentators and media are sure to rev up the conversation about gender, women and politics.

book cover
But a Clinton win in 2016, while historic, wouldn’t necessarily bust the so-called glass ceiling the former secretary of State, U.S. senator and first lady often references, says
Lori Cox Han
, Ph.D., a professor in the Department of Political Science. Cox Han is the author of the new book
In It to Win: Electing Madam President
(Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015). Indeed, if there’s a ceiling at all.

“Some women-in-politics scholars are moving away from the idea of a glass ceiling. When we’re talking about the White House, it’s not a good analogy,” says Cox Han, who has published extensively on the topic of women in politics and is considered a leading expert on the American presidency.

In the latest of her 13 books, the professor suggests that fewer barriers may exist than some have suggested, and that Americans are simply waiting for the right candidate at the right political moment in time.

Because while advancement in the business world might be about “moving up the ladder,” the paths to the White House – and other top elective offices – are more complicated, she says.

And those complications are less about gender bias and fundraising than they are about the complex American presidential election process shaped by the Constitution, candidate recruitment into politics and the shortage of women governors in large states, she says.

“There aren’t enough women in the presidential and vice-presidential on-deck circle. There are so few women who are governors and in leadership positions in Congress. That’s one of the big things,” she says.

woman smiling

Professor Lori Cox Han


And why so few women governors? Cox Han suspects part of the answer may be in the low voter turnout for such elections, which often land on midterm election years.

Moreover, most of the reasons blamed for a lack of women candidates – from media bias to gender issues – just don’t hold up to political science research, Cox Han says. Polls overwhelmingly show support for a woman president, and female candidates are proven fundraisers, sometimes outperforming male counterparts because some groups look to specifically support women seeking elective office.

And at this particular political moment, there’s a female candidate who is hard to compete with, says Cox Han, who believes Clinton will win the Democratic nomination for 2016.

“She sucks the air out of the room. You can’t have that conversation about all these other women until she’s not part of the dialogue,” she says.

Save the date to learn more


Professor Lori Cox Han will talk about women in politics and her new book In It to Win: Electing Madam President at the final Spring 2015 Faculty Forum Lecture Series from 11:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Tuesday, April 21, in Argyros Forum 209C.

Dawn Bonker

Dawn Bonker

2 comments

  • “…fewer barriers may exist than some have suggested, and that Americans are simply waiting for the right candidate at the right political moment in time”.

    Lori certainly hit the nail on the head!

  • I agree with her logic. There just aren’t enough women being fed into a position where they might compete for the presidency. Winning the presidency then becomes like winning the superbowl or becoming a famous celebrity, etc. Hiring practices, wages, women in governorships.. that is where the glass ceiling lies, and that is something unaffected by a woman holding the highest office in the land (I mean, queens ruled empires over the ages while women languished in sexism). The process itself is too complicated and requires too much luck. One only needs to be marginally accepted as a group to potentially have a shot. It’s just not an indication of the larger picture of treatment and influence of different groups. We should probably appreciate the symbolism, however. It definitely counts for something psychosocially. But I wonder if this should be considered when electing a candidate.